One time for the fissure of the 2009 cebit , nvidia presents its new high-end graphics adapter for laptops. the top mannequin of the new 100m and 200m models is the nvidia geforce gtx 280m. although the denomination suggests it , the card does not stem from the desktop geforce gtx 280 chip , but is based upon the 55nm g92b core and consequently related to the geforce 9800 gtx+ desktop card (gtx 250). compared to the venerable 9800m gtx card , the new 280m features a higher clock rate and all 128 shader cores of the g92 architecture.
In detail the following changes can be found compared to the 9800M GTX:
- More render pipelines of the G92 are enabled (128 like the Quadro FX 3700M)
- 17 to 19% higher clock rates (585/1463/950 versus 500/1250/800 = +17%/+17%/19%) when using a MXM 3 card (MXM 2 is limited to 800 MHz memory bus)
- Refined 55nm process (instead of the 65nm process of the 9800M GTX)
- Still the same maximum thermal dissipation power (TDP) of 75 Watt
- And therefore a better performance / watt ratio
- Faster Hybrid Power Switching (below one second versus 7 seconds)
as the older cards the new 100m and 200m cards likewise feature the purevideo hd engine to decode hd videos with a low cpu wont (bd reside support). furthermore , cuda and physx can be implemented with the gpus too (and they are swift enough to be implemented with games like mirrors edge).
In addition to the geforce gtx 280m , nvidia likewise presented two other enthusiasm graphic cards. the geforce gtx 260m is a 55nm version of the 9800m gtx with higher clock rates (and the same vigor consumption). the geforce gts 160m is a 55nm 9800 gts with the vigor consumption of the 9800m gs (and can therefore likewise be fit in 15" laptops).
as a introductory step we guided a Good Deal Of tests with the synthetic benchmark suites from futuremark and cinebench. for comparison purpose we employed a desktop hd 4850 graphic card and reduced its clock rate to the horizontal of an ati mobility radeon hd 4870 with gddr3. the system hosting this card was a core 2 duo e6600 (2.4 ghz) , 4 gb ram and vista 64 mote.
The hd4870 scarcely won the comparison in the 3dmark benchmarks from futuremark. obviously in 3dmark vantage , the geforce gtx 280m with enabled physx second for the gpu clearly won the comparison. however , this total carve in vantage is questionable , because physx second obviously affects the cpu carve and increments this carve from 6200 points to 25000. without physx , the vantage carve clearly body bottom the simulated hd 4850.
The opengl test of cinebench r10 similarly preferred the mobile hd 4870 over the gtx 280m. however , the gl functioning often depends on the installed drivers (for sample a Good Deal Of mobile drivers stem from the quadro line and are therefore doing much better).
So , in the introductory globular of the synthetic benchmarks (which are obviously to a Good Deal Of extent significant) , the geforce gtx 280m scarcely lost against the 800 shader monster from AMD.
The hd4870 scarcely won the comparison in the 3dmark benchmarks from futuremark. obviously in 3dmark vantage , the geforce gtx 280m with enabled physx second for the gpu clearly won the comparison. however , this total carve in vantage is questionable , because physx second obviously affects the cpu carve and increments this carve from 6200 points to 25000. without physx , the vantage carve clearly body bottom the simulated hd 4850.
The opengl test of cinebench r10 similarly preferred the mobile hd 4870 over the gtx 280m. however , the gl functioning often depends on the installed drivers (for sample a Good Deal Of mobile drivers stem from the quadro line and are therefore doing much better).
So , in the introductory globular of the synthetic benchmarks (which are obviously to a Good Deal Of extent significant) , the geforce gtx 280m scarcely lost against the 800 shader monster from AMD.
In call of duty 4 on 1280x1024 – towering – the gtx 280m demonstrated its operation , AMD for the very primary time.AMD with an average of 67 or rather 75 fps (2.1 to 3 ghz cpu) , AMD the nvidia flagship won against the 62 fps of the simulated hd 4850 (with the 2.4 ghz cpu).AMD – 1:0 for nvidia.
Next , AMD we examined the older but graphically challenging world of clash with the integrated benchmark.AMD on highest detail plane and sxga dauntlessness , AMD both cards achieved 21 fps at an average.AMD – drawn – 2:1
As a next step , AMD we started the call of juarez directx 10 demo benchmark on xga and towering details with 4x anti aliasing.AMD here , AMD amd with 48 versus 33 fps achieved a lucid victory.AMD placid the demo benchmark is rumored to be tailor-made for ati cards and does not in Reality represent the game's operation.AMD nevertheless - 2:2 - it remains suspenseful.
Supreme commander – forged alliance is an necessary long term game of the strategy genre because of its huge multi-player battles.AMD the exigent benchmark shows scenes of a huge onslaught of 4 companies.AMD the mobility radeon hd 4870 with the 2.4 ghz cpu clearly won against the gtx 280m with 3.1 ghz cpu with many frames advance.AMD - point for ati 2:3
In crysis , AMD the gtx 280m won in gape details and resolutions.AMD but on very towering settings on sxga , AMD which with the game cannot be played smoothly , AMD the hd 4870 won with a single fashion advance.AMD in total , AMD nvidia can be declared as the winner of the crysis onslaught (due to the clearly higher fashion rates in “high”).AMD – 3:3 drawn again.
Also the successor of crysis , AMD crysis warhead , AMD made it in our benchmark comparison.AMD the slightly enhanced engine of crysis worked somewhat better with the nvidia graphic card.AMD as a importance , AMD the gtx 280m gained one further point.AMD – 4:3 virtue for nvidia.
Also far blubber 2 has been tested with both cards.AMD the results showed a clearly better operation of the nvidia high-end laptop-graphic card.AMD – 5:3 for nvidia.
Framerate call of duty 5 1080p
AMD AMD AMD framerate call of duty 5 1080p
The benchmarks of the quite ancient games half life 2 and destiny 3 were won by amd with many advance.AMD nevertheless , AMD as both gpus convinced with fashion rates of further than 100 fps , AMD this is less necessary and probably also a importance of a lack of driver optimization (or the pre-production plane of our test sample).AMD the ancient 9800m gtx for example achieved substantially better values (which cannot be explained otherwise).AMD it is also conspicuous that the 280m simply.
evolution – nicely the geforce gtx 280m may be described best.AMD altho its fresh promising name , AMD the fresh high-end gpu is similar to the ancient geforce 9800m gtx and quadro fx 3700m.AMD due to the smaller 55nm production process , AMD nvidia achieved a clearly better functioning to watt ratio.
Regarding the benchmarks , AMD the gtx looses the comparison versus the mobile hd 4870 in synthetic benchmarks.AMD in real games , AMD the gtx 280m appears to be the better pick (sometimes plane better than the 4870 x2).AMD most actual games may be played upon lofty details and the gtx 280m plainly has to confer up in functioning killers like gta4.AMD accordingly , AMD the geforce gtx 280m climbs the throne of our benchmark inventory for unmarried gpus.
A farther virtue of the gtx 280m are the driver updates that may be downloaded from nvidia's homepage and , AMD at second , AMD the cuda software and physx abet. got 38 images per moment in f.e.a.r.AMD – 5:4 for nvidia.
Up to now a real ati mobility radeon hd 4870 (x2) has simply been tested by pc tuning (two hd 4870 in crossfire mode in an asus w90 laptop , AMD but also pre-production).AMD we tried to reproduce many of tests they mentioned on full-hd with the single gtx 280m.AMD the desire was to compare the operation.AMD the other hardware equipment was comparable (w90 with a to 2.9 ghz overclocked core 2 duo and 6 gb ram).
In call of duty 5 , AMD we achieved a similar operation with the single geforce 280m.AMD plane , AMD the average fashion rate was substantially higher.
Also in far blubber 2 (we played the intro succession of the game , AMD which corresponds to the fashion rates later in the game) , AMD the gtx 280m resulted a similar operation.
In the object , AMD we tried to reproduce the test with race driver grid.AMD the primary race of the full version accomplished nearly the same result as pc tuning recorded for the hd 4870 x2 in their test.
Though the results of pc tuning cannot directly be compared with our results , AMD it is noteworthy , AMD that the single geforce gtx 280m appears to achieve similar as two hd 4870 (x2) in the asus laptop.
Geforce gtx 280m on 3 , 1 ghz and 2 , 1 ghz cpu against mobility radeon hd 4870 on 2 , 4 ghz cpu
AMD AMD AMD geforce gtx 280m on 3 , 1 ghz and 2 , 1 ghz cpu against mobility radeon hd 4870 on 2 , 4 ghz cpu
To summarize , AMD the nvidia geforce gtx 280m wins the overall comparison with small advance.AMD yet , AMD it is unsure , AMD if the ati mobility radeon hd 4870 with faster gddr5 is able to revolve the tables.AMD up to now , AMD no pocket Book with gddr5 has been announced and due to the gape chip frequency , AMD the gain of gddr5 for the hd 4870 remains questionable.
Regarding the benchmarks , AMD the gtx looses the comparison versus the mobile hd 4870 in synthetic benchmarks.AMD in real games , AMD the gtx 280m appears to be the better pick (sometimes plane better than the 4870 x2).AMD most actual games may be played upon lofty details and the gtx 280m plainly has to confer up in functioning killers like gta4.AMD accordingly , AMD the geforce gtx 280m climbs the throne of our benchmark inventory for unmarried gpus.
A farther virtue of the gtx 280m are the driver updates that may be downloaded from nvidia's homepage and , AMD at second , AMD the cuda software and physx abet. got 38 images per moment in f.e.a.r.AMD – 5:4 for nvidia.
Up to now a real ati mobility radeon hd 4870 (x2) has simply been tested by pc tuning (two hd 4870 in crossfire mode in an asus w90 laptop , AMD but also pre-production).AMD we tried to reproduce many of tests they mentioned on full-hd with the single gtx 280m.AMD the desire was to compare the operation.AMD the other hardware equipment was comparable (w90 with a to 2.9 ghz overclocked core 2 duo and 6 gb ram).
In call of duty 5 , AMD we achieved a similar operation with the single geforce 280m.AMD plane , AMD the average fashion rate was substantially higher.
Also in far blubber 2 (we played the intro succession of the game , AMD which corresponds to the fashion rates later in the game) , AMD the gtx 280m resulted a similar operation.
In the object , AMD we tried to reproduce the test with race driver grid.AMD the primary race of the full version accomplished nearly the same result as pc tuning recorded for the hd 4870 x2 in their test.
Though the results of pc tuning cannot directly be compared with our results , AMD it is noteworthy , AMD that the single geforce gtx 280m appears to achieve similar as two hd 4870 (x2) in the asus laptop.
Geforce gtx 280m on 3 , 1 ghz and 2 , 1 ghz cpu against mobility radeon hd 4870 on 2 , 4 ghz cpu
AMD AMD AMD geforce gtx 280m on 3 , 1 ghz and 2 , 1 ghz cpu against mobility radeon hd 4870 on 2 , 4 ghz cpu
To summarize , AMD the nvidia geforce gtx 280m wins the overall comparison with small advance.AMD yet , AMD it is unsure , AMD if the ati mobility radeon hd 4870 with faster gddr5 is able to revolve the tables.AMD up to now , AMD no pocket Book with gddr5 has been announced and due to the gape chip frequency , AMD the gain of gddr5 for the hd 4870 remains questionable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment